There is a wide range of movable guards on plant and machinery – from small covers to large, accessible gates. But how can you reliably protect human and machine? In three simple steps, we’ll show you how to find the right safety locking device for each application.
Step 1: Accessible or non-accessible?
In step 1, a look at the respective installation situation of the safeguard on the plant or machine provides an initial, important indication of the right safety locking device. The deciding factor here is whether or not the safeguard is accessible. That’s because accessible safeguards require an escape release, for example.
Groundbreaking: EN ISO 14119
The standard EN ISO 14119 “Safety of machinery – Interlocking devices associated with guards – Principles for design and selection” regulates the safeguarding of movable guards, whether that be swing gates or sliding gates, covers, flaps or rolling doors. It also refers to the subject of manipulation, and describes measures designed to prevent the defeat of safeguards and their interlocking devices.
Step 2: Process or personnel protection?
Step 2 is to assess whether the respective plant or machine still presents a hazard, even after the stop command. This relates to machines that still overrun; robot applications for example. In this case, the guard may not be unlocked until the machine is in a safe state and has completely stopped. It must not be possible to open the safety gate until the machine no longer poses a danger. Process guarding or safe guard locking may be required for personnel protection; that depends on the stopping time. If the time it takes to reach the danger zone is greater than the stopping time, then process guarding is sufficient. In this case, the process itself should be protected as a priority, and unwanted disruptions to production should be excluded. However, if the danger zone can be reached before the stopping time is ended, then personnel protection in accordance with EN ISO 13849–1 is required – accordingly, a safety locking device that guarantees this must be selected. Because in this case, the safety of the operator must be guaranteed.
Step 3: Which Performance Level is required?
Ultimately, selection of the right safeguard is made on the basis of the Performance Level (PL). This is determined using a risk analysis in accordance with EN ISO 13849–1. The key factors for this calculation are the severity of the potential injuries, frequency of exposure to the risk and ability to avoid the risks. PL e indicates the highest risk.
How do I find the right safety locking device? Find out!
With the decision pathway, step by step, users find the right safety solution for guard locking on safety gates.
Wanted: A movable safety guard
(doors, covers, flaps, swing gates and sliding gates)
Accessible or non-accessible?
Option 1
Non-accessible safeguard
(covers, flaps)
Option 2
Accessible safeguard
(gates)
Show 1
Process or personnel protection?
Option 11
Process guarding
(intervention times > downtimes)
Option 12
Personnel protection/
safe guard locking
(intervention times < downtimes)
Show 2
Process or personnel protection?
Option 21
Process guarding
(intervention times > downtimes)
Option 22
Personnel protection/
safe guard locking
(intervention times < downtimes)
Show 11
Which Performance Level is required?
Performance Level
(gate monitoring)
Option 111
c
Option 112
d
Option 113
e
Show 12
Which Performance Level is required?
Performance Level
(guard locking monitoring)
Option 121
c
Option 122
d
Option 123
e
Show 21
Which Performance Level is required?
Performance Level
(gate monitoring)
Option 211
c
Option 212
d
Option 213
e
Show 22
Which Performance Level is required?
Performance Level
(guard locking monitoring)
Option 221
c
Option 222
d
Option 223
e
Show 111
The right products for your application:
PSEN me1 / PSEN me5
Further information about PSEN me1 / PSEN me5 on the Pilz website
Show 112
The right products for your application:
PSENslock 2
Further information about PSENslock 2 on the Pilz website
Show 113
The right products for your application:
PSENslock 2
Further information about PSENslock 2 on the Pilz website
Show 121
The right products for your application:
PSEN me1 / PSEN me5
PSENslock 2 (Arbeltsstromprinzip)
Further information about PSEN me1 / PSEN me5 on the Pilz website
Further information about PSENslock 2 on the Pilz website
Show 122
The right products for your application:
PSEN me1 / PSEN me5 + PSENbolt
PSENmlock mini
Further information about PSEN me1 / PSEN me5 + PSENbolt on the Pilz Website
Further information about PSENmlock mini on the Pilz website
Show 123
The right products for your application:
PSENmlock
Further information about PSENmlock on the Pilz website
Show 211
The right products for your application:
PSENme1 / PSENme5
Further information about PSENme1 / PSENme5 on the Pilz website
Show 212
The right products for your application:
PSENslock 2
Further information about PSENslock 2 on the Pilz website
Show 213
The right products for your application:
PSENslock 2
Further information about PSENslock 2 on the Pilz website
Show 221
The right products for your application:
PSENme1 / PSENme5
PSENslock 2 (Arbeitsstromprinzip)
Further information about PSENme1 / PSENme5 on the Pilz website
Further information about PSENslock 2 on the Pilz website
Show 222
The right products for your application:
PSENme1 / PSEN me5 + PSENbolt
Further information about PSENme1 / PSEN me5 + PSENbolt on the Pilz website
Show 223
The right products for your application:
PSENmlock / PSENsgate
Further information about PSENmlock on the Pilz website
Further information about PSENsgate on the Pilz website
Which safety locking device in this case?
An example: on a packaging machine there is a small, built-in flap, through which the new packaging material is fed. The intervention time is greater than the machine’s stopping time. In accordance with EN ISO 13849–1, the machine requires Performance Level d. In this case, the new PSENmlock mini would be ideally suitable for this installation situation. As its name suggests, it has a compact design and is ideal for use in space-critical installation situations. With its high holding force of 1 950 N (F1max: 3 900 N), it also guarantees safe guard locking for this application.
Another example: on a machine, sausages are cut into appropriate slices first, then portioned and finally packed in air-tight packaging. If there are any malfunctions, the operators may reach into the machine area. However, the intervention time is less than the stopping time. The danger from the machine corresponds to Performance Level e. The new safety locking device PSENslock 2 is suitable for this sensitive area, for example, as it has a hygienic design, is available as a stainless steel version and meets protection type IP67 / IP6K9K. PSENslock 2 guarantees reliable safeguarding of the safety gate, prevents unwanted disruptions to production and thus ensures high productivity.
Good to know
The safety locking devices are based on various guard locking principles, which vary with regard to energy consumption.
What is the
normally
de-energised mode?
What is the
normally de-energised mode?
Guard locking is via a magnet. This is activated to lock the guard locking device, and then deactivated to release the guard locking device. In the event of a fault, such as a power failure for example, the guard locking device is released and the user has access to the danger zone.
Products that are based on the normally de-energised mode:
PSENslock2
What is the
normally energised mode?
What is the
normally energised mode?
Guard locking is via spring force. This is activated when closing the safeguard, and deactivated via magnetic force when opening it. In the event of a power failure, the safeguard remains locked.
Products that are based on the normally energised mode:
PSENme1 und PSENme5
What do we
mean by
the bistable principle?
What do we mean by the bistable
principle?
With the bistable principle, the safety locking device maintains its current position in the event of a power failure. Power must be applied in order to bring the guard locking device to another state. The bistable principle also reduces energy consumption, as the guard locking device only needs to have power applied whenever the gate is locked or released.
Products that are based on the bistable principle:
PSENmlock mini (power on only to release),
PSENmlock and PSENmgate (power on to lock and release the guard locking device)
The safeguarding options are as wide-ranging as the safeguards themselves: “No machine is the same as the other; no hazard is the same as the one before”, explains Erich Wagner from Product Management at Pilz. “We continuously develop our products so that we can offer our customers the right solution for their application. As a result, we offer a comprehensive portfolio of safety locking devices. As a partner, we also support our customers when selecting the right control unit, access control and small controller, in order to configure the complete, optimum solution.” On modular systems, safety locking devices can be combined perfectly with the right analysis units, diagnostic systems, and control units with access control. So you can find the ideal, individual solution for each application. Experts from Pilz provide advice every step of the way, in order to find the right solution and implement it for users accordingly.
1 Comment
Awesome to see how the flowchart gives a clear outcome and explanation. You can fill in and see what a client needs. the difference between process protection and person protection